WSL Fantasy Gameweek 4: best buys and captain picks
WSL Fantasy Gameweek 4 preview: best buys, captain picks and who to sell
WSL Fantasy Gameweek 4 is a transfer decision about the next three weeks, not just this weekend. Manchester City start the best run in the game with its easiest fixture first, and the latest numbers make that opener even stronger. Manchester United have the best defensive run, and Chelsea's program improves after a hard first week. Twelve clubs have no Gameweek 6 fixture in the current schedule. Several of the most-owned players in the game also project very few minutes, so this is a good week to move them on.
Every number below comes from the latest TheFantasyTool model run before the Gameweek 4 deadline, including the updated predicted lineups. The full pool is ranked on the WSL Fantasy player picks page, and every club's remaining fixtures are on the WSL Fantasy schedule.
The programs: whose next three Gameweeks are worth owning
Look only at this week and Manchester City come first by a distance. Look at three weeks and the order behind them changes. The table is sorted on three-round expected goals, with the fourteen clubs that play all three rounds listed first. The last column is expected clean sheets across the three games, so 1.26 means a defence projected to keep about one and a quarter clean sheets over the run.
| Team | GW4 fixture | Win probability | GW4 expected goals | GW4 clean sheet | Program (GW4-6) | 3-round xG | 3-round CS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester City | [A]CHA | 91.9% | 3.56 | 65.3% | [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA | 7.89 | 1.25 |
| Chelsea | [H]ARS | 37.7% | 1.50 | 23.3% | [H]ARS → [A]WHU → [H]TOT | 6.93 | 1.13 |
| Manchester United | [H]WHU | 62.7% | 2.09 | 38.5% | [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA | 6.11 | 1.26 |
| Arsenal | [A]CHE | 35.9% | 1.46 | 22.4% | [A]CHE → [A]MCI → [H]BIC | 5.99 | 0.98 |
| Aston Villa | [A]TOT | 18.8% | 1.11 | 12.5% | [A]TOT → [H]CRY → [H]LIV | 4.92 | 0.62 |
| Tottenham Hotspur | [H]AVL | 59.0% | 2.08 | 33.0% | [H]AVL → [H]LCL → [A]CHE | 4.82 | 0.68 |
| London City Lionesses | [H]BHA | 48.6% | 1.75 | 29.2% | [H]BHA → [A]TOT → [H]EVE | 4.26 | 0.73 |
| Brighton | [A]LCL | 26.1% | 1.23 | 17.4% | [A]LCL → [H]CHA → [A]MCI | 4.08 | 0.61 |
| Liverpool | [H]EVE | 51.5% | 1.57 | 39.6% | [H]EVE → [A]MAN → [A]AVL | 3.94 | 0.79 |
| Crystal Palace | [A]BIC | 19.4% | 1.03 | 15.1% | [A]BIC → [A]AVL → [H]WHU | 3.79 | 0.42 |
| Everton | [A]LIV | 21.2% | 0.93 | 20.8% | [A]LIV → [H]BIC → [A]LCL | 3.62 | 0.85 |
| Birmingham City | [H]CRY | 56.6% | 1.89 | 35.7% | [H]CRY → [A]EVE → [A]ARS | 3.53 | 0.64 |
| West Ham United | [A]MAN | 15.6% | 0.95 | 12.4% | [A]MAN → [H]CHE → [A]CRY | 3.46 | 0.43 |
| Charlton | [H]MCI | 1.7% | 0.43 | 2.9% | [H]MCI → [A]BHA → [H]MAN | 2.15 | 0.28 |
| Wolverhampton | [A]IPS | 46.8% | 1.69 | 28.6% | [A]IPS → [H]WAT (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 4.14 | 0.61 |
| Bristol City | [A]BUR | 40.7% | 1.61 | 23.4% | [A]BUR → [H]SOU (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 3.18 | 0.48 |
| Newcastle United | [H]LEI | 42.3% | 1.42 | 31.9% | [H]LEI → [A]DUR (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 3.13 | 0.64 |
| Southampton | [H]NFO | 50.5% | 1.61 | 36.7% | [H]NFO → [A]BRC (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 3.00 | 0.58 |
| Sunderland | [A]WAT | 42.1% | 1.68 | 23.3% | [A]WAT → [H]LEI (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 2.90 | 0.45 |
| Burnley | [H]BRC | 33.7% | 1.45 | 19.9% | [H]BRC → [A]NFO (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 2.75 | 0.46 |
| Ipswich Town | [H]WOL | 27.5% | 1.25 | 18.4% | [H]WOL → [A]SHU (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 2.71 | 0.49 |
| Durham | [A]SHU | 42.0% | 1.56 | 26.6% | [A]SHU → [H]NEW (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 2.71 | 0.45 |
| Leicester City | [A]NEW | 29.4% | 1.14 | 24.2% | [A]NEW → [A]SUN (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 2.65 | 0.54 |
| Watford | [H]SUN | 32.7% | 1.46 | 18.7% | [H]SUN → [A]WOL (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 2.59 | 0.27 |
| Sheffield United | [H]DUR | 31.5% | 1.33 | 20.9% | [H]DUR → [H]IPS (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 2.51 | 0.44 |
| Nottingham Forest | [A]SOU | 22.7% | 1.00 | 20.1% | [A]SOU → [H]BUR (2 fixtures, GW6 blank) | 2.34 | 0.48 |
The bottom twelve rows only have two fixtures in the window, so their totals cannot be compared with the rows above. Every pick from those clubs below is described as a two-week buy. In the current schedule Gameweek 6 holds seven matches, all between the fourteen clubs at the top of the table, so check the schedule again before you plan past Gameweek 5.
Manchester City's [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA is the best three-round run in the game at 7.89 expected goals. The Charlton trip now carries a 91.9% win probability and a 65.3% clean-sheet chance, both the highest of the round by a wide margin. The Arsenal week is the one to plan around, not a reason to stay away. Manchester United are the defensive version of the same idea: 1.26 expected clean sheets is the best figure in the game, just ahead of City's 1.25, and none of [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA is a fixture to hide from. Chelsea are the program to buy early. [H]ARS → [A]WHU → [H]TOT opens with their hardest game of the three. Live win and clean-sheet prices are on the WSL market probabilities page.
Goalkeepers for Gameweek 4
Ayaka Yamashita (5.5m, MCI) is the pick of the round at 4.8 projected, the highest of any keeper, on a program of [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA. The Charlton clean-sheet chance is the best in the game this week, and the Brighton home game two rounds later brings her back up. Only the Arsenal week in between is a real contest: 4.8 → 3.4 → 4.0, 12.2 across the run, at 12.0% ownership.
Phallon Tullis-Joyce (5.5m, MAN) is the keeper to buy and keep, and here the round and the run disagree. Yamashita wins Gameweek 4. Over [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA, Tullis-Joyce's 12.7 is the highest three-round total of any goalkeeper, and her trajectory never dips (4.1 → 4.1 → 4.5). If you are buying one keeper and holding her, buy Tullis-Joyce. 16.0% of managers own her. Courtney Brosnan (Everton) matches Yamashita's 12.2 over [A]LIV → [H]BIC → [A]LCL, with her best week in Gameweek 5.
Lysianne Proulx (4.0m, IPS) is the budget route: 4.4 → 4.4 → blank behind [H]WOL → [A]SHU, with the best points per million of any keeper. Ipswich blank in Gameweek 6, so she is a two-week holding and her replacement should be planned now. Anna Tamminen (5.0m, NEW) is the same trade from Newcastle, 4.3 → 4.4 → blank across [H]LEI → [A]DUR. Confirm both keep the gloves on the WSL predicted lineups page before the deadline.
Hannah Hampton (54.0% owned) is a hold, not a sell. Arsenal at home is her weakest game of the run at 3.5, but [A]WHU and [H]TOT lift her to 11.4 across three. Selling a good program to dodge one hard week costs more than it saves.
Defenders for Gameweek 4
Maya Le Tissier (6.0m, MAN) is the best defensive buy in the game, and the round and the run agree on her. Her program is [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA. She projects 5.3 this week and 16.9 across the three, the highest of any defender, and her trajectory rises: 5.3 → 5.5 → 6.1. She is projected for 85 minutes, so there is no rotation risk to price in. At 30.0% ownership she is well known, which is why the defenders around her matter more.
Fridolina Rolfö (5.5m, MAN) is the differential inside the same program, [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA: 4.1 → 6.0 → 4.5, 14.6 in total. Her peak comes in the Liverpool week, when she is the top-projected defender in the game. The risk is minutes. She is projected for 54, so she is the higher-variance version of the same bet, at 4.0% ownership. Jayde Riviere (5.0m, MAN) is the cheaper way into [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA, 4.2 → 4.8 → 4.2 for 13.2. The three-per-club limit applies: Le Tissier, Rolfö, Riviere and Tullis-Joyce are four Manchester United players, so pick three.
Ruby Mace (5.5m, EVE) is the one to buy a week early. Everton's [A]LIV → [H]BIC → [A]LCL starts with the derby at Liverpool, where she projects 3.7. Then it rises: 3.7 → 5.0 → 4.5 for 13.2, on 88 projected minutes. Buy her before the good part of the run, not during it. Ellie Carpenter (Chelsea) has the same shape for 12.8, but costs 1.5m more and is owned by 27.0% of managers.
Oliwia Wos (4.0m, BRC) is the budget defender of the round: 4.9 projected, the best points per million of any defender. Her program is [A]BUR → [H]SOU with Bristol City's Gameweek 6 blank behind it, so this is a two-week pick (4.9 → 4.4 → blank). Leah Mitchell (4.0m, IPS) is the same trade from Ipswich, 4.7 → 5.3 → blank across [H]WOL → [A]SHU, and her Gameweek 5 number is higher than her Gameweek 4 one. Kenzie Weir (5.0m, IPS) gives you the same Ipswich run for 1.0m more at 4.8 → 5.3 → blank.
Grace Fisk (5.0m, LIV) is a Gameweek 4 buy and only that. Liverpool's [H]EVE carries a 39.6% clean-sheet chance, the second-best of the round, and she projects 5.0. Then come [A]MAN and [A]AVL, and she drops to 3.0 and 3.8. Buy her for the derby if you want the fixture, and plan to sell again for Gameweek 5. Asato Miyagawa (4.5m, BIC) is the cheaper one-rounder: 5.1 at home to Crystal Palace, then 2.8 and 1.4 on [H]CRY → [A]EVE → [A]ARS.
| Player | Price | Owned | Program (GW4-6) | GW4 | GW4-6 trajectory | 3-round total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maya Le Tissier | 6.0m | 30.0% | [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA | 5.3 | 5.3 → 5.5 → 6.1 | 16.9 |
| Fridolina Rolfö | 5.5m | 4.0% | [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA | 4.1 | 4.1 → 6.0 → 4.5 | 14.6 |
| Jayde Riviere | 5.0m | 2.0% | [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA | 4.2 | 4.2 → 4.8 → 4.2 | 13.2 |
| Ruby Mace | 5.5m | 11.0% | [A]LIV → [H]BIC → [A]LCL | 3.7 | 3.7 → 5.0 → 4.5 | 13.2 |
| Grace Fisk | 5.0m | 15.0% | [H]EVE → [A]MAN → [A]AVL | 5.0 | 5.0 → 3.0 → 3.8 | 11.8 |
| Oliwia Wos | 4.0m | 1.0% | [A]BUR → [H]SOU | 4.9 | 4.9 → 4.4 → blank | 9.3 |
| Leah Mitchell | 4.0m | 0.0% | [H]WOL → [A]SHU | 4.7 | 4.7 → 5.3 → blank | 10.0 |
Midfielders for Gameweek 4
Kirsty Hanson (8.0m, TOT) and Lauren Hemp (8.0m, MCI) are the two premium midfielders, and this is where the round and the run disagree. Hemp is now the top-projected midfielder in Gameweek 4 at 8.2, on City's [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA. Hanson is 0.3 behind this week on [H]AVL → [H]LCL → [A]CHE, but she is the top-projected player in the whole game in Gameweek 5 (7.5), and her 18.8 over three rounds edges Hemp's 18.2. If you are buying one and keeping her through the Arsenal week, buy Hanson. She scored 12 goals from 6.7 xG last season, and at 18.0% ownership she is still a differential. Hemp's case is her form: 1.86 xG and 2.66 xA in 270 minutes this season.
Jessica Park (8.0m, MAN) is the hold. She is never the top midfielder in Gameweek 4 or 5, but [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA gives her 6.0 → 5.6 → 6.2, the flattest good trajectory in the game, for 17.8. A flat program means you can buy her now and stop worrying about the position, which is not true of anyone else at her price. She is also the top-projected midfielder in Gameweek 6.
Ceri Holland (6.5m, LIV) is the value pick at 6.5 projected, and she takes Liverpool's penalties. Her program is [H]EVE → [A]MAN → [A]AVL. The shape dips and recovers, 6.5 → 4.0 → 5.7, for 16.2 across three, and only 4.0% of managers own her. Signe Gaupset (Tottenham) shares Hanson's program for 12.4 if you want that run for less.
Beth Hepple (7.5m, DUR) and Emily Syme (7.5m, BRC) are two-week buys from the second tier. Hepple projects 6.9 this week, the fifth-highest of any player, then 5.1 on [A]SHU → [H]NEW before the Gameweek 6 blank. She is projected for 83 minutes and owned by 2.0%. Syme goes 6.2 → 5.8 → blank on [A]BUR → [H]SOU, owned by 2.0%. Poppy Wilson (4.0m, WAT) has the best points per million of any midfielder, 4.2 → 5.8 → blank across [H]SUN → [A]WOL, a two-week enabler to fund a premium. For Gameweek 6, Géraldine Reuteler (6.0m, ARS) jumps to 6.1 when Arsenal host Birmingham on [A]CHE → [A]MCI → [H]BIC, so she is a buy for that week, not this one.
| Player | Price | Owned | Program (GW4-6) | GW4 | GW4-6 trajectory | 3-round total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsty Hanson | 8.0m | 18.0% | [H]AVL → [H]LCL → [A]CHE | 7.9 | 7.9 → 7.5 → 3.4 | 18.8 |
| Lauren Hemp | 8.0m | 38.0% | [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA | 8.2 | 8.2 → 3.9 → 6.1 | 18.2 |
| Jessica Park | 8.0m | 20.0% | [H]WHU → [H]LIV → [A]CHA | 6.0 | 6.0 → 5.6 → 6.2 | 17.8 |
| Ceri Holland | 6.5m | 4.0% | [H]EVE → [A]MAN → [A]AVL | 6.5 | 6.5 → 4.0 → 5.7 | 16.2 |
| Beth Hepple | 7.5m | 2.0% | [A]SHU → [H]NEW | 6.9 | 6.9 → 5.1 → blank | 12.0 |
| Emily Syme | 7.5m | 2.0% | [A]BUR → [H]SOU | 6.2 | 6.2 → 5.8 → blank | 12.0 |
| Poppy Wilson | 4.0m | 0.0% | [H]SUN → [A]WOL | 4.2 | 4.2 → 5.8 → blank | 10.0 |
Forwards for Gameweek 4
Khadija Shaw (12.5m, MCI) is the highest-projected player in the game at 10.1, and her program is why she is worth the full price: [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA returns 10.1 → 5.3 → 8.2, or 23.6 across the three. That is 6.7 points clear of any other forward. She is Manchester City's penalty taker, projects 1.02 goals at Charlton, and has 5.15 xG in 270 minutes this season. At 66.0% ownership she is the template player.
Vivianne Miedema (9.0m, MCI) gives you the same [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA for less: 7.3 → 3.9 → 5.7 for 16.9, with 0.63 projected goals this week, at 6.0% ownership. Owning both is a legitimate double-up because each is a good pick on her own. Shaw, Miedema, Hemp and Yamashita would be four City players, though, and the limit is three.
Madison Haley (6.5m, BHA) and Kiko Seike (7.0m, BHA) are the mid-price pair, and both are buys because of Gameweek 5. Brighton's [A]LCL → [H]CHA → [A]MCI peaks at home to Charlton, where both project 6.1, joint second-highest in the game that week behind Hanson. Haley is on penalties and goes 5.0 → 6.1 → 2.8 for 13.9; she had 7.26 xG in 1,326 minutes last season. Seike goes 4.8 → 6.1 → 3.0 for 13.9. Both drop at City in Gameweek 6, so treat them as two-week holds. Amalie Vangsgaard (6.5m, AVL) and Hannah Cain (6.0m, EVE) are the more patient versions at 13.3 each. Vangsgaard's [A]TOT → [H]CRY → [H]LIV jumps to 5.9 at home to Crystal Palace, and Cain's [A]LIV → [H]BIC → [A]LCL peaks at 5.2 against Birmingham. Both are owned by 1.0% of managers.
| Player | Price | Owned | Program (GW4-6) | GW4 | GW4-6 trajectory | 3-round total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khadija Shaw | 12.5m | 66.0% | [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA | 10.1 | 10.1 → 5.3 → 8.2 | 23.6 |
| Vivianne Miedema | 9.0m | 6.0% | [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA | 7.3 | 7.3 → 3.9 → 5.7 | 16.9 |
| Kiko Seike | 7.0m | 9.0% | [A]LCL → [H]CHA → [A]MCI | 4.8 | 4.8 → 6.1 → 3.0 | 13.9 |
| Madison Haley | 6.5m | 1.0% | [A]LCL → [H]CHA → [A]MCI | 5.0 | 5.0 → 6.1 → 2.8 | 13.9 |
| Amalie Vangsgaard | 6.5m | 1.0% | [A]TOT → [H]CRY → [H]LIV | 3.2 | 3.2 → 5.9 → 4.2 | 13.3 |
| Hannah Cain | 6.0m | 1.0% | [A]LIV → [H]BIC → [A]LCL | 3.6 | 3.6 → 5.2 → 4.5 | 13.3 |
Captain picks for Gameweek 4
The captain scores double in WSL Fantasy, so this is the biggest single decision of the week.
- Khadija Shaw (12.5m, MCI): 10.1 projected, the highest in the game, against the easiest fixture of the round, with City's penalties. Program: [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA. She is the top-projected player again in Gameweek 6 at 8.2, so the armband and the ownership decision point the same way.
- Lauren Hemp (8.0m, MCI): 8.2 projected in the same Charlton fixture as Shaw, on [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA. She is the cheaper way to captain that game.
- Kirsty Hanson (8.0m, TOT): 7.9 projected at home to Aston Villa on [H]AVL → [H]LCL → [A]CHE, and the best captain in the game in Gameweek 5 at 7.5.
Looking ahead changes which premiums you should own. Hanson is the best captain in Gameweek 5. Shaw is the best again in Gameweek 6. Owning Shaw and Hanson covers all three weeks, which is a stronger argument for Hanson than her Gameweek 4 number alone. The live single-round optimum, captain included, is on the WSL optimal teams page.
Who to sell before Gameweek 4
Alexia Putellas (8.5m, LCL) is the clearest sell in the game. 51.0% of managers own her, but the model projects her for only 23 minutes this week and 1.1 → 1.1 → 1.5 across London City's [H]BHA → [A]TOT → [H]EVE, which is 3.7 over three rounds. London City's program is fine. The problem is her minutes, and her projection stays under 2 points in each of the next six Gameweeks. Why now: nothing in the schedule changes that, so every week you hold her is another week of a premium price returning almost nothing.
Ona Batlle (6.0m, ARS) is the same call at a lower price. She is 37.0% owned and projected for 36 minutes, and Arsenal's [A]CHE → [A]MCI → [H]BIC opens with away games at Chelsea and Manchester City. That gives 1.3 → 1.3 → 1.6. Mapi León (29.0% owned, 23 projected minutes), Leah Williamson (21.0%, 26 minutes) and Daniëlle van de Donk (23.0%, 31 minutes) are in the same position. None of the three projects more than 1.5 in any of the next three Gameweeks, and none has a fixture coming that changes that. Why now: the same reason. Waiting a round buys you nothing.
Alex Greenwood (6.0m, MCI) is a sell with a different timing, and you can wait a round on this one. [A]CHA is an excellent fixture and she projects 5.8, one of the top defender numbers this week. This is not a bad week for her. But [H]ARS and [H]BHA follow and she drops to 1.6 and 2.8, on 73 projected minutes. So keep her for Charlton, and make the move before the Gameweek 5 deadline. She is 26.0% owned.
Kerstin Casparij (8.0m, MCI) is the same call one price bracket up, on the same [A]CHA → [H]ARS → [H]BHA. She is the top-projected defender this week at 6.3, then 2.5 against Arsenal and 4.0 against Brighton. At 8.0m, 12.8 across three rounds does not compete with Le Tissier's 16.9 at 6.0m. Why not now: the Charlton clean sheet is the best one on offer this round. Why before Gameweek 5: that is when her number collapses, and at 34.0% ownership the downgrade is where you gain rank.
Best Free Hit team for Gameweek 4
If you are playing a Free Hit this week, only this round matters and the programs above do not apply. The strongest one-week squad we found, with the three-per-club limit respected, is a 3-5-2 built around the City attack:
- GK: Lysianne Proulx (4.0m, 4.4)
- DEF: Maya Le Tissier (6.0m, 5.3), Asato Miyagawa (4.5m, 5.1), Grace Fisk (5.0m, 5.0)
- MID: Lauren Hemp (8.0m, 8.2), Kirsty Hanson (8.0m, 7.9), Beth Hepple (7.5m, 6.9), Ceri Holland (6.5m, 6.5), Emily Syme (7.5m, 6.2)
- FWD: Khadija Shaw (12.5m, 10.1, captain), Vivianne Miedema (9.0m, 7.3)
- Bench: Kenzie Weir (5.0m), Leah Mitchell (4.0m), Olivia Clark (4.0m), Emily Murphy (5.0m)
That XI projects 83.0 points with Shaw's captaincy counted. City's three slots go to Shaw, Miedema and Hemp rather than a defender, because the attacking returns at Charlton outscore the clean sheet. For the exact live optimum, solve it yourself on the WSL optimal teams page.
Planning around the Gameweek 6 blank
Twelve clubs have no Gameweek 6 fixture in the current schedule: Bristol City, Burnley, Durham, Ipswich Town, Leicester City, Newcastle United, Nottingham Forest, Sheffield United, Southampton, Sunderland, Watford and Wolverhampton. Every budget player recommended above (Proulx, Tamminen, Wos, Mitchell, Weir, Hepple, Syme, Wilson) comes from that group, and all of them are worth owning for Gameweeks 4 and 5 on their own numbers. The point is to buy them knowing Gameweek 6 is when you move them on, not to find out in two weeks. The players whose programs run through all three rounds are the Manchester United, Manchester City, Tottenham, Everton, Liverpool and Brighton names above.
Past rounds are archived in the WSL Fantasy preview hub. Last week's WSL Fantasy Gameweek 3 preview covers the picks that carried into this round, and new managers should start with the WSL Fantasy guide to tips, rules and strategy.
FAQ
Who should I captain in WSL Fantasy Gameweek 4?
Khadija Shaw. She is the highest-projected player in the game at 10.1 for Gameweek 4. Manchester City go to Charlton with the round's highest win probability at 91.9%, and she is their penalty taker. Lauren Hemp at 8.2 is the alternative in the same fixture, and Kirsty Hanson at 7.9 is the best captain in Gameweek 5.
Which budget defenders are best for WSL Fantasy Gameweek 4?
Oliwia Wos at 4.0m projects 4.9, the best points per million of any defender, and Leah Mitchell at 4.0m goes 4.7 → 5.3 → blank across [H]WOL → [A]SHU. Both blank in Gameweek 6, so plan them as two-week picks. For a defender to keep, Maya Le Tissier leads the position with 16.9 over the next three Gameweeks.
Should I sell Alexia Putellas before WSL Fantasy Gameweek 4?
Yes. She is 51.0% owned, but the model projects her for 23 minutes this week and 3.7 points across Gameweeks 4 to 6, and her projection stays under 2 points in each of the next six Gameweeks. Kirsty Hanson at 8.0m projects 18.8 over the same three rounds.
Best differentials for WSL Fantasy Gameweek 4?
Ceri Holland (6.5m, LIV) at 4.0% is on penalties with 16.2 over three rounds. Fridolina Rolfö (5.5m, MAN) at 4.0% shares the best defensive program in the game, and Vivianne Miedema (9.0m, MCI) at 6.0% gives you City's run at a fraction of Shaw's ownership.
Which teams have no fixture in WSL Fantasy Gameweek 6?
Bristol City, Burnley, Durham, Ipswich Town, Leicester City, Newcastle United, Nottingham Forest, Sheffield United, Southampton, Sunderland, Watford and Wolverhampton have no Gameweek 6 fixture in the current schedule. All twelve play in Gameweeks 4 and 5, so budget picks from those clubs are still worth owning as two-week holdings.
This preview was written by TheFantasyTool AI.